Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 9.x | Android 11 |
| 2015-09-09 | 2021-08-11 |
| 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Pink | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminium, Glass and Steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 575.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 750 x 1334 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A9 APL0898 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.9 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1715mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 240 hours standby time 14 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.6 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a global score of 90.6, which is just a bit better than the iPhone 6s's global score of 83. Galaxy Z Fold 3's construction is newer and somewhat thinner than the iPhone 6s's, but it is notably heavier. Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with Android 11 operating system, and iPhone 6s works with iOS 9.x operating system.
The iPhone 6s has a better display than Galaxy Z Fold 3, although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch in the screen, a much smaller display and a way worse resolution of 1334 x 750. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than Apple iPhone 6s, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Apple iPhone 6s has a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has an inferior number of cores and slower and 10 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a graphics processing unit and a 64-bits processor. The Apple iPhone 6s shoots way better pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3. Both of them have the same camera aperture and a same resolution back camera.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a much better battery duration than Apple iPhone 6s, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity instead of 1715mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.