Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| iOS 9.x | Android 10 |
| 2015-09-09 | 2020-09-08 |
| 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Pink | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Aluminium, Glass and Steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 575.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 750 x 1334 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 326 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A9 APL0898 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.9 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1715mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 240 hours standby time 14 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.6 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 6s is a little bit better than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, with a global score of 83 against 81.6. The Apple iPhone 6s construction is way lighter and much thinner than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, despite of the fact that it was released 5 years before. The Apple iPhone 6s counts with iOS 9.x operating system, and Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC comes with Android 10 operating system.
The iPhone 6s features a bit superior CPU than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has less RAM memory and an inferior number of cores, it also counts with an extra GPU and a 64 bits processing unit. The iPhone 6s has a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has a lot smaller display, a little bit less pixels per inch in the screen and a lot worse 1334 x 750 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little bit brighter display.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a way better camera than Apple iPhone 6s, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has a lot higher resolution camera in the back, a bigger aperture to take better low light captures and videos and a lot bigger camera sensor taking much better quality photos and videos.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a slightly bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Apple iPhone 6s, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a very superior battery duration than iPhone 6s, because it has a 5160mAh battery capacity instead of 1715mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.