Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| 2016-09-16 | 2018-06-29 |
| 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 4.87 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Jet black, Red, Rose gold and Silver | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 849.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A10 Fusion APL1W24 (16 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR 7XT GT7600 Plus GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1960mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.84 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 7 has a global score of 81.6, which is a bit better than Moto Z3 Play's overall score of 76.3. The iPhone 7 design is lighter than the Moto Z3 Play, although it's a little bit thicker and was released just a little over a year before. IPhone 7 counts with a bit better looking display than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, although it has a quite lower pixel amount in each inch of display, a way lower resolution of 750 x 1334 pixels and a way smaller screen.
Moto Z3 Play has a quite bigger storage for apps and games than iPhone 7, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The iPhone 7 has just a little better performance than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, although it has 4 less cores and lesser RAM memory.
IPhone 7 and Motorola Moto Z3 Play count with incredibly similar cameras, and although the Motorola Moto Z3 Play has a larger camera aperture for better low light images and videos and a bigger camera sensor, they both have the same video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same resolution camera in the back.
Moto Z3 Play counts with a way better battery life than iPhone 7, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity instead of 1960mAh.
Although iPhone 7 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto Z3 Play, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto Z3 Play. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the iPhone 7, else you can save some dollars and get the Moto Z3 Play, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.