Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2016-09-16 | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 4.87 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Jet black, Red, Rose gold and Silver | Black |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 849.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 326 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A10 Fusion APL1W24 (16 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR 7XT GT7600 Plus GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1960mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 3.84 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 7 has a score of 81.6, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 score. Even though iPhone 7 is extremely older than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, it's design is a lot thinner and noticeably lighter. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit better hardware performance than Apple iPhone 7, because it has a higher number of cores (and also faster) and 2 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit better looking screen than iPhone 7, because it has a lot greater pixels amount per inch in the display, a way better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a bit larger screen. The Apple iPhone 7 has a greater memory for apps and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Apple iPhone 7 takes much better videos and photos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for capturing photographs or videos in low-light environments and a smaller back-facing camera sensor which offers a worse image and video quality, and they both have the same resolution camera in the back, the Apple iPhone 7 also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a much better battery performance than iPhone 7, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
IPhone 7 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a lot cheaper, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.