Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-09-16 | 2020-11-27 |
| 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 4.87 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Jet black, Red, Rose gold and Silver | Cool blue, Power black and Yellow |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 849.00 | $ 149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 326 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A10 Fusion APL1W24 (16 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR 7XT GT7600 Plus GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1960mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.84 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 7 is slightly better than Xiaomi Poco M3, having an 81.6 score against 78.2. Apple iPhone 7's construction is notably lighter and noticeably thinner than Xiaomi Poco M3, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. The iPhone 7 features a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Poco M3, although it has an inferior number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM.
The iPhone 7 has a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Poco M3, although it has a little less pixels per inch in the display, a really smaller screen and a lot lower 750 x 1334 resolution. Apple iPhone 7 counts with more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
Xiaomi Poco M3 features a way better battery lifetime than iPhone 7, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 1960mAh. Xiaomi Poco M3 shoots better videos and photos than iPhone 7, and although they both have the same video quality, a same size diafragm aperture and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also has a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back camera with a lot better 48 mega pixels resolution.
Although Apple iPhone 7 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Xiaomi Poco M3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xiaomi Poco M3. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Apple iPhone 7, else you can save some money and buy the Xiaomi Poco M3, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.