Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-09-16 | 2020-05-05 |
| 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.87 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Jet black, Red, Rose gold and Silver | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 849.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 326 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A10 Fusion APL1W24 (16 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR 7XT GT7600 Plus GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1960mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.84 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 7 is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, having an 81.6 score against 81.1. The iPhone 7 construction is notably lighter and somewhat thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, even though it was released many years before. Apple iPhone 7 has a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, although it has a way worse resolution of 750 x 1334px, a quite worse screen pixels density and a really smaller screen.
IPhone 7 has a greater storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a bit better performance than Apple iPhone 7, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a higher number of cores.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro shoots much clearer pictures and videos than iPhone 7, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a lot bigger sensor which offers a lot higher photo and video quality and a much more mega-pixels camera.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a superior battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 7, because it has a 156 percent greater battery size.
Although Apple iPhone 7 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.