Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-16 | 2020-04-07 |
| 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.87 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Jet black, Red, Rose gold and Silver | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 849.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 326 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A10 Fusion APL1W24 (16 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR 7XT GT7600 Plus GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1960mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.84 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 7 is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, with a general score of 81.6 against 79. The iPhone 7 design is extremely lighter and somewhat thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, although it was released many years before. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a little faster processing unit than Apple iPhone 7, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores.
IPhone 7 has a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, although it has a lot smaller screen, a way worse 750 x 1334 resolution and a little bit worse quantity of pixels per inch of display. IPhone 7 features a greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a way better battery lifetime than iPhone 7, because it has a 156% larger battery capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a much better camera than iPhone 7, and although they both have the same video quality, the same video frame rates and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a much better 48 MP resolution camera and a way bigger sensor taking way better quality videos and photos.
Although Apple iPhone 7 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.