Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2017-09-22 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.24 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 949.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2691mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 Plus is better than Motorola Moto Z Force, getting a general score of 87.1 against 75.8. The iPhone 8 Plus body is newer than Motorola Moto Z Force's, although it's just a bit thicker and heavier. The iPhone 8 Plus counts with a superior CPU than Moto Z Force, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits processor and 2 more cores.
Moto Z Force has a display that is just as good as Apple iPhone 8 Plus's display, and although the Moto Z Force has a greater display pixel density and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution, they both have a display with the same size. Moto Z Force counts with a better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Apple iPhone 8 Plus, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Motorola Moto Z Force features better battery duration than iPhone 8 Plus, because it has a 30% more battery size. Apple iPhone 8 Plus counts with just a bit better camera than Moto Z Force, although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a lot worse resolution camera, they both have a same size aperture.
Although iPhone 8 Plus is a better device, it is way more expensive than Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto Z Force. If you want to save some money, you can buy Moto Z Force, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.