Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| 2017-09-22 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.24 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 949.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2691mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
IPhone 8 Plus is much better than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, having a score of 87.1 against 77.4. Although iPhone 8 Plus is a better cellphone than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, we must highlight that it's also much heavier and extremely thicker. IPhone 8 Plus has a little sharper screen than Motorola Moto Z2 Play. Both have an equal 1080 x 1920 resolution, the same screen pixels density and a screen of the same size.
The Apple iPhone 8 Plus features a greater performance than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits CPU. The iPhone 8 Plus takes clearer videos and photos than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have a back-facing camera with a 12 mega pixels resolution and the same (4K) video resolution, the iPhone 8 Plus also counts with faster 60 fps video frame rate.
The Moto Z2 Play counts with a better memory to install applications and games than iPhone 8 Plus, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Moto Z2 Play counts with a little better battery duration than iPhone 8 Plus, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity.
Although iPhone 8 Plus is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto Z2 Play. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get Motorola Moto Z2 Play, letting go a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.