Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-09-22 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.24 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 949.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2691mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 Plus is just a bit better than Motorola One Hyper, with an 87.1 score against 79.8. IPhone 8 Plus's construction is somewhat thinner than Motorola One Hyper, although it's a bit heavier and was released 2 years before. Apple iPhone 8 Plus counts with a better performing CPU than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has 2 less cores (although faster) and 1 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
The iPhone 8 Plus counts with a little bit better looking display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite higher display pixel density. Motorola One Hyper features a superior camera than iPhone 8 Plus, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light photography and slower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a lot higher 64 MP resolution camera.
The Motorola One Hyper features a quite bigger storage to install games and applications than Apple iPhone 8 Plus, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1000 GB. The Motorola One Hyper counts with a very superior battery lifetime than iPhone 8 Plus, because it has a 49% greater battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone 8 Plus is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola One Hyper, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola One Hyper. If you want to save some money, you can buy the Motorola One Hyper, and give up a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.