Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-09-22 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.24 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray | Ocean |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 949.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2691mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 Plus has an overall score of 87.1, which is a little bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Pro's score of 83.1. Although the iPhone 8 Plus is a lot older than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, it's body is somewhat thinner and a bit lighter. OPPO Find X2 Pro features a slightly better looking screen than iPhone 8 Plus, because it has a larger display, a better screen density, more brightness and a lot higher 1440 x 3168 resolution.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a way bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone 8 Plus, because it has 512 GB internal storage. IPhone 8 Plus has a bit better CPU than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because although it has 2 less and slower cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a much longer battery life than Apple iPhone 8 Plus, because it has 4260mAh of battery capacity against 2691mAh. The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a better camera than iPhone 8 Plus, and although they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a larger aperture to capture better captures and video in low-light environments, a back facing camera with a much better 48 mega pixels resolution and a much larger camera sensor taking much higher quality videos and photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.