Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-09-22 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.24 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 949.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 10.17 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2691mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 8 Plus is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, having an 87.1 score against 79.9. Apple iPhone 8 Plus's body is a little bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, although it is just a little heavier and was released many years before. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has just a bit better looking display than iPhone 8 Plus, because although it has a quite lower pixel number in each screen inch, it also counts with a lot brighter screen, a bigger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340.
The Galaxy A25 5G counts with more memory capacity for games and applications than iPhone 8 Plus, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1 TB. Apple iPhone 8 Plus has a way better performance than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a lower number of cores (although faster) and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
Galaxy A25 5G counts with a little bit better camera than Apple iPhone 8 Plus, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a back camera with much more megapixels and a larger sensor.
The Galaxy A25 5G features a way better battery performance than Apple iPhone 8 Plus, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.