Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-09-22 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.24 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 949.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 10.17 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2691mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 8 Plus is a little bit better than Galaxy A35 5G, with a score of 87.1 against 79.4. Although Apple iPhone 8 Plus is much older than Galaxy A35 5G, it's construction is just a little bit thinner and a little bit lighter. The iPhone 8 Plus has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a quite lower 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a bit more brightness and a little more pixels per inch in the screen.
IPhone 8 Plus has a much more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has 3 GB lesser RAM and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit. Galaxy A35 5G takes much clearer videos and photos than iPhone 8 Plus, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and pictures and a camera in the back with way more megapixels.
IPhone 8 Plus features a way bigger memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because it has more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features a superior battery performance than iPhone 8 Plus, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 2691mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.