Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2017-09-22 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.24 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 949.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2691mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is slightly better than the Apple iPhone 8 Plus, with a global score of 91.3 against 87.1. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a way newer and a little bit lighter device than the Apple iPhone 8 Plus, but it's also a little bit thicker. IPhone 8 Plus has a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, although it has a little smaller display, a bit worse pixels density and a little worse 1080 x 1920 resolution.
IPhone 8 Plus features a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has an inferior number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits processor. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a quite bigger storage capacity for games and applications than iPhone 8 Plus, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy A52 5G takes better pictures and videos than Apple iPhone 8 Plus, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same diafragm aperture and the same video resolution, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a way bigger sensor taking way higher quality videos and photos and a much more mega-pixels back facing camera.
The Galaxy A52 5G has a way better battery life than iPhone 8 Plus, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.