Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2017-09-22 | 2022-06-29 |
| 6.24 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 8.29 ounces |
| Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 949.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 10.17 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2691mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 8 Plus has a score of 87.1, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro's 77.6 overall score. IPhone 8 Plus is an noticeably older phone than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, but Apple made it lighter and a lot thinner anyway. Apple iPhone 8 Plus has a much greater processing power than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a lower number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
The iPhone 8 Plus counts with a much better looking screen than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher pixel density. Apple iPhone 8 Plus shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a way lower resolution camera, and they both have a same size aperture, the Apple iPhone 8 Plus also counts with a lot larger sensor taking lot better quality photos and videos.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a quite bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Apple iPhone 8 Plus, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a really longer battery performance than iPhone 8 Plus, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity instead of 2691mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.