Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2017-09-22 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.24 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 949.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 401 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2691mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 8 Plus has a global score of 87.1, which is a little bit better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro's global score of 80.1. Although the Apple iPhone 8 Plus is much older than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, it's design is notably lighter and extremely thinner. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a slightly better looking display than iPhone 8 Plus, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560.
The iPhone 8 Plus features a better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. IPhone 8 Plus counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores and they are also slower, it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a way better battery life than Apple iPhone 8 Plus, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. IPhone 8 Plus captures much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor which provides a lower photo and video quality and a tinier camera aperture, and they both have a same resolution back-facing camera, the iPhone 8 Plus also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, iPhone 8 Plus is also cheaper than the other phone, making it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.