Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 88.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-09-22 | 2019-09-24 |
| 6.24 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.08 x 2.85 x 0.41 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 8.50 ounces |
| Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 949.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.9 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2250 x 2088 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 389 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 108.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2691mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha is slightly better than the iPhone 8 Plus, with a general score of 88.9 against 87.1. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha design is notably newer than the iPhone 8 Plus's, although it is somewhat heavier and extremely thicker. The iPhone 8 Plus counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, because although it has lesser RAM memory and a lower number of cores, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
Apple iPhone 8 Plus counts with a slightly better display than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, because although it has a way smaller screen and a way lower 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a quite greater pixel density. Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha counts with a bit better camera than iPhone 8 Plus, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha also has a lot larger sensor which offers a lot better photo and video quality, a larger aperture for better photography and video in poorly lited situations and a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha has much more memory for applications and games than Apple iPhone 8 Plus, because it has 256 GB more internal storage. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha features a really longer battery performance than iPhone 8 Plus, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity instead of 2691mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.