Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-09-22 | 2020-09-08 |
| 6.24 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 949.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2691mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 8 Plus is a bit better than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, having a score of 87.1 against 81.6. The Apple iPhone 8 Plus body is a bit lighter and somewhat thinner than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, even though it was released many years before. The Apple iPhone 8 Plus features a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has a lower number of cores (although faster) and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
The iPhone 8 Plus has a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per screen inch and more display brightness. The Apple iPhone 8 Plus counts with a very superior storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Apple iPhone 8 Plus, because although it has a smaller camera aperture and lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a much more mega-pixels camera in the back and a lot larger sensor which offers a lot better image and video quality.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a very superior battery lifetime than iPhone 8 Plus, because it has a 92 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.