Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | ZTE |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-09-22 | 2020-02-07 |
| 6.24 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray | Black, Ochre and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 949.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2691mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 8 Plus has a general score of 87.1, which is better than the ZTE Axon 10s Pro's 76.6 overall score. The Apple iPhone 8 Plus body is a little thinner than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, but it's somewhat heavier and was released 2 years before. Apple iPhone 8 Plus has a little bit better looking screen than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite greater screen density.
The iPhone 8 Plus has a bit superior processor than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has lesser RAM and a lower number of cores, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit. The Apple iPhone 8 Plus takes clearer videos and photos than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a way smaller sensor offering a much lower image quality, a tinier camera aperture which is worse for capturing photographs and/or video in poorly lited situations and a back facing camera with a lot worse 12 MP resolution, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro has a greater memory for applications and games than Apple iPhone 8 Plus, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. ZTE Axon 10s Pro features a superior battery duration than iPhone 8 Plus, because it has a 49% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.