Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | ZTE |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-09-22 | 2020-12-21 |
| 6.24 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.78 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 949.00 | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 389 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2691mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4220mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 8 Plus has a score of 87.1, which is much better than ZTE Axon 20's general score of 77.8. The iPhone 8 Plus construction is just a bit thinner than the ZTE Axon 20, although it is a bit heavier and was released 3 years before. Apple iPhone 8 Plus has a bit sharper screen than ZTE Axon 20, because although it has a lot smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920px, it also counts with a little bit better screen density.
IPhone 8 Plus features just a bit better processing power than ZTE Axon 20, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and lesser and slower cores, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit. The ZTE Axon 20 counts with a lot better camera than Apple iPhone 8 Plus, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for capturing photographs and videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the ZTE Axon 20 also counts with a way higher resolution camera in the back and a way bigger back camera sensor.
IPhone 8 Plus has a superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than ZTE Axon 20, because it has more internal storage. ZTE Axon 20 has a really longer battery lifetime than iPhone 8 Plus, because it has a 57% more battery size.
Although Apple iPhone 8 Plus is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the ZTE Axon 20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as ZTE Axon 20. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy ZTE Axon 20, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.