Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | ZTE |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-09-22 | 2021-06-04 |
| 6.24 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray | Black, Gold, Green and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 949.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 35.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2691mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 8 Plus is much better than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, getting a global score of 87.1 against 78.1. The iPhone 8 Plus design is just a little bit thinner than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, although it's just a little heavier and was released 4 years before. Apple iPhone 8 Plus has just a bit better hardware performance than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and a lower number of cores and also slower, it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
Apple iPhone 8 Plus counts with a little more vivid display than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a quite better display density. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has a better camera than iPhone 8 Plus, because it has a bigger aperture for better low-light captures and video, a way higher video resolution and a lot more MP back facing camera.
The Apple iPhone 8 Plus counts with a much better storage for games and applications than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because it has more internal memory capacity. The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra counts with a much longer battery life than iPhone 8 Plus, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity.
Apple iPhone 8 Plus is more expensive than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.