Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS | -- |
| -- | 2018-11-15 |
| -- | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| -- | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A20 (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple GPU GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 6.39 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.89 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 6.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) is better than the Apple iPhone Fold (Rumored), getting an 85.2 score against 73.5. Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a much better display than iPhone Fold (Rumored), although it has a bit smaller display. The Galaxy A9 (2018) features a much better hardware performance than iPhone Fold (Rumored), although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
The Galaxy A9 (2018) features a slightly better memory to install applications and games than iPhone Fold (Rumored), because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 512 GB. IPhone Fold (Rumored) has better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity against 3800mAh.
IPhone Fold (Rumored) takes clearer videos and photos than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a much higher 7680x4320 video quality and a much more mega-pixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.