Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| -- | 2013-09-04 |
| -- | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| -- | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 2.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A20 (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Apple GPU GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.39 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| -- | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.56 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 6.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 is much better than the Apple iPhone Fold (Rumored), having an 81.2 score against 73.5. Galaxy Note 3 comes with Android 5.0 OS, and Apple iPhone Fold (Rumored) works with iOS OS. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a lot better processing power than iPhone Fold (Rumored), because although it has a lower amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a graphics co-processor.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a lot better display than Apple iPhone Fold (Rumored), although it has a much smaller screen. Apple iPhone Fold (Rumored) counts with a superior memory to install applications and games than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
IPhone Fold (Rumored) features a really longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 47 percent larger battery size. Apple iPhone Fold (Rumored) takes much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a camera with a lot better 50 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.