Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | HTC |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | -- |
| 2020-04-24 | 2017-05-18 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 399.00 | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 326 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 10.35 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 3.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone SE (2020) is just a bit better than HTC U11, getting a overall score of 81.5 against 77.6. IPhone SE (2020)'s body is incredibly newer, somewhat lighter and just a little thinner than the HTC U11. The Apple iPhone SE (2020) features a quite better hardware performance than HTC U11, because although it has lesser RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
HTC U11 has just a bit better screen than Apple iPhone SE (2020), because it has a lot more pixels per inch in the display, a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a bigger screen. Apple iPhone SE (2020) takes a little bit better videos and photos than HTC U11, because although it has a tinier camera aperture and a smaller back camera sensor taking less light and duller colors, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a 12 megapixels resolution camera, the Apple iPhone SE (2020) also counts with higher 60 fps video frame rate.
The HTC U11 counts with a lot bigger storage to install games and applications than Apple iPhone SE (2020), and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the HTC U11 also has an external memory card slot that holds up to 128 GB. HTC U11 counts with a really longer battery duration than Apple iPhone SE (2020), because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone SE (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the HTC U11, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the HTC U11. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the HTC U11, letting go a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.