Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-04-24 | 2016-09-01 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 399.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 10.35 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 3.68 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone SE (2020) has a global score of 81.5, which is a bit better than the Motorola Moto Z Force's 75.8 overall score. IPhone SE (2020) works with iOS 15.x operating system, and Motorola Moto Z Force works with Android 7.0 Nougat operating system. IPhone SE (2020)'s construction is a lot newer and just a bit lighter, but just a little thicker than Motorola Moto Z Force.
The iPhone SE (2020) has a greater performance than Moto Z Force, because although it has lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of cores (and faster) and a 64-bit processing unit. Moto Z Force counts with a bit more vivid screen than iPhone SE (2020), because it has a larger display, a much better display pixel density and a much better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
The Moto Z Force has a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Apple iPhone SE (2020), and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Moto Z Force also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Moto Z Force has a very superior battery duration than Apple iPhone SE (2020), because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity.
IPhone SE (2020) captures slightly better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z Force, although it has a back facing camera with way less mega-pixels resolution and a lower (4K) video resolution, they both have the same diafragm aperture.
Although Apple iPhone SE (2020) is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto Z Force. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Apple iPhone SE (2020), but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Moto Z Force, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.