Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | -- |
| 2020-04-24 | 2017-06-29 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 399.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 10.35 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 3.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The iPhone SE (2020) is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, having a global score of 81.5 against 77.4. IPhone SE (2020) is a extremely newer cellphone than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, although it's just a little heavier and thicker. IPhone SE (2020) counts with a slightly better display than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, although it has a way lower resolution of 750 x 1334, a quite smaller display and a little bit worse display pixel density.
IPhone SE (2020) features a superior processor than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has less CPU cores (although they are faster) and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU. The Moto Z2 Play has a lot bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than iPhone SE (2020), and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the Moto Z2 Play also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Moto Z2 Play features a way better battery performance than iPhone SE (2020), because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity. IPhone SE (2020) captures clearer photographs and videos than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and a back facing camera with a 12 mega-pixels, the iPhone SE (2020) also counts with higher 60 fps video frame rates.
Although Apple iPhone SE (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto Z2 Play. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Apple iPhone SE (2020), otherwise you can save some money and get the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.