Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-04-24 | 2018-08-16 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 399.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 10.35 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 3.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone SE (2020) has a global score of 81.5, which is a little bit better than Moto Z3's 77.6 global score. The iPhone SE (2020) has iOS 15.x operating system, and Moto Z3 works with Android 9.0 Pie operating system. Although the iPhone SE (2020) is a little thicker than Moto Z3, it's just a little lighter and newer.
IPhone SE (2020) has a little more vivid display than Motorola Moto Z3, although it has a way worse 750 x 1334 resolution, a little lower number of pixels per inch of display and a way smaller display. Apple iPhone SE (2020) counts with a faster CPU than Moto Z3, because although it has 1 GB less RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
Moto Z3 has a much bigger memory to store more games and applications than iPhone SE (2020), and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Moto Z3 also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. IPhone SE (2020) takes a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z3, because although it has a smaller sensor taking less light and dull colors, and they both have a 12 MP resolution back camera and the same (4K) video definition, the iPhone SE (2020) also counts with faster video frame rate and a bigger aperture to capture better captures in low-light situations.
The Moto Z3 features a very superior battery duration than iPhone SE (2020), because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone SE (2020) is a better device, it is more expensive than the Moto Z3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto Z3. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Apple iPhone SE (2020), otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Moto Z3, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.