Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 15 |
| 2020-04-24 | 2025-04-24 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | -- |
| 5.22 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 399.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 7 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | -- |
| IPS LCD | LTPO |
| 326 pixels per inch | -- |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 10.35 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 3.68 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone SE (2020) has a general score of 81.5, which is slightly better than the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s 79.2 score. IPhone SE (2020) counts with iOS 15.x OS, and Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) works with Android 15 OS. IPhone SE (2020) has a much faster CPU than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because although it has lesser CPU cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
IPhone SE (2020) has a lot better display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has much worse brightness and a lot smaller display. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a much better memory capacity to store more apps and games than iPhone SE (2020), because it has more internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a superior battery life than Apple iPhone SE (2020), because it has a 158% larger battery size. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a better camera than iPhone SE (2020), and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) also has a lot better video definition and a camera in the back with a lot better 50 MP resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.