Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 12 |
| 2020-04-24 | 2022-06-29 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 8.29 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 399.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 326 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 10.35 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 3.68 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone SE (2020) is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, having an 81.5 score against 77.6. IPhone SE (2020)'s construction is noticeably thinner and extremely lighter than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. IPhone SE (2020) has iOS 15.x OS, while Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has Android 12 OS.
IPhone SE (2020) counts with a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, although it has a quite inferior pixel number per screen inch, a way lower resolution of 750 x 1334 and a really smaller display. Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a much better memory to install applications and games than Apple iPhone SE (2020), because it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory.
The iPhone SE (2020) has a really superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and lesser cores , it also counts with a 64 bits CPU. IPhone SE (2020) takes just a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a much less mega-pixels back-facing camera, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the iPhone SE (2020) also counts with a way larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro counts with a really longer battery life than iPhone SE (2020), because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.