Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-24 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 399.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 326 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 10.35 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 3.68 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone SE (2020) is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, with a score of 81.5 against 81. The Apple iPhone SE (2020) design is extremely lighter and a lot thinner than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, even when both of them were released only a few months apart. The Apple iPhone SE (2020) counts with iOS 15.x OS, and Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro works with Android 11 OS.
The iPhone SE (2020) counts with a quite superior processing power than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM and 2 lesser cpu cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit. Apple iPhone SE (2020) features a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, although it has a quite worse display pixels density, a really smaller display and a much lower resolution of 750 x 1334.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a superior memory to install applications and games than Apple iPhone SE (2020), and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
IPhone SE (2020) captures a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture and a way less MP resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a way higher video resolution and a much bigger camera sensor providing a way higher image quality. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a much better battery life than iPhone SE (2020), because it has a 4050mAh battery size.
The iPhone SE (2020) not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.