Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Apple |
| 2016-03-31 | 2018-09-21 |
| 4.87 x 2.31 x 0.30 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 3.99 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Gold, Rose gold, Silver and Space gray | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 499.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1136 x 640 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A9 APL0898 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GT7600 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.64 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 1.20 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1624mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.44 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XS has an overall score of 84.2, which is much better than iPhone SE's 75.7 general score. The Apple iPhone XS is a way heavier device than the iPhone SE, but both are 0.3inches thick. Apple iPhone XS features a better looking screen than iPhone SE, because it has a bit brighter display, a better number of pixels per screen inch, a lot better 1125 x 2436px resolution and a lot larger screen.
IPhone SE has a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone XS, because it has more internal memory. IPhone XS has a faster processor than iPhone SE, because it has 4 more processing cores, more RAM and a 64 bits processing unit. The iPhone XS captures a little bit better videos and photos than iPhone SE, and although they both have a 12 mega pixels back facing camera and the same (4K) video quality, the iPhone XS also has a larger aperture, a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality and higher video frame rate.
The iPhone XS features a really longer battery performance than iPhone SE, because it has 2659mAh of battery capacity instead of 1624mAh.
Although iPhone XS is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the iPhone SE, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as iPhone SE. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get iPhone SE, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.