Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| -- | Android 5.1, 5.0 |
| 2016-03-31 | 2014-10-15 |
| 4.87 x 2.31 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches |
| 3.99 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Gold, Rose gold, Silver and Space gray | Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 499.00 | $ 1019.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6 inches |
| 1136 x 640 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 490 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A9 APL0898 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR GT7600 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 1.20 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1624mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3220mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time |
| 3.44 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6 has a score of 81.1, which is a bit better than the iPhone SE's 75.7 overall score. The Google Nexus 6 construction is older, a lot heavier and notably thicker than iPhone SE. The Google Nexus 6 has a more vivid screen than iPhone SE, because it has a much higher amount of pixels per inch of screen, a lot higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a way larger screen.
IPhone SE has a much bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Nexus 6, because it has more internal storage capacity. Google Nexus 6 features a more powerful CPU than iPhone SE, because it has more RAM memory, a graphics processor and 2 more processing cores. The Google Nexus 6 features a much better battery life than iPhone SE, because it has a 3220mAh battery capacity instead of 1624mAh.
The Google Nexus 6's camera is very similar to Apple iPhone SE's camera, and although the Google Nexus 6 has a more mega pixels camera and a bigger aperture, they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Although Google Nexus 6 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than iPhone SE, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the iPhone SE. If you want to save some money, you can get the iPhone SE, letting go some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.