Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| 2016-03-31 | 2019-10-24 |
| 4.87 x 2.31 x 0.30 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 3.99 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Gold, Rose gold, Silver and Space gray | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 499.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1136 x 640 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A9 APL0898 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GT7600 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 1.20 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1624mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.44 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL has a general score of 82.9, which is a little bit better than the iPhone SE's 75.7 global score. Google Pixel 4 XL's body is noticeably newer than iPhone SE's, although it is a little bit thicker and heavier. The Google Pixel 4 XL has a superior performance than iPhone SE, because it has a greater number of cores and a higher amount of RAM.
Google Pixel 4 XL has a little more vivid screen than Apple iPhone SE, because it has a much better resolution of 1440 x 3040px, a much higher pixel count per inch of display and a way larger display. The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a bit better camera than iPhone SE, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video definition, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a way larger diafragm aperture to take better images in low light environments, a larger camera sensor taking better quality videos and pictures and a more mega-pixels camera.
IPhone SE features a much better storage to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has more internal memory capacity. The Google Pixel 4 XL features a much better battery life than iPhone SE, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, the Google Pixel 4 XL is also cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.