Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-03-31 | 2020-11-19 |
| 4.87 x 2.31 x 0.30 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 3.99 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Gold, Rose gold, Silver and Space gray | Clearly white and Just black |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 499.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1136 x 640 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A9 APL0898 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GT7600 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 1.20 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1624mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.44 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is better than iPhone SE, with a overall score of 87.5 against 75.7. Even though the Google Pixel 4a 5G is a lot newer than the iPhone SE, it's noticeably heavier and just a little thicker. The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a little sharper display than Apple iPhone SE, because it has more pixels per display inch, a way better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a much larger display.
Google Pixel 4a 5G's storage for games and applications is just as good as Apple iPhone SE's one, both have exactly the same internal storage capacity. Google Pixel 4a 5G features a little faster CPU than iPhone SE, because it has 6 more CPU cores and a larger amount of RAM. The Google Pixel 4a 5G captures slightly better videos and photos than iPhone SE, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a more megapixels back-facing camera, a lot bigger aperture to capture better low light photography, higher video frame rates and a larger sensor taking better quality photos and videos.
Google Pixel 4a 5G features a way better battery duration than iPhone SE, because it has 3885mAh of battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G costs a bit more than iPhone SE, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.