Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2016-03-31 | 2023-04-04 |
| 4.87 x 2.31 x 0.30 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 3.99 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Gold, Rose gold, Silver and Space gray | Interstellar Black |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 499.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1136 x 640 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A9 APL0898 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GT7600 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 8.64 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 1.20 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1624mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.44 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is much better than the iPhone SE, with a general score of 83.4 against 75.7. Even though Motorola Edge 40 Pro is noticeably newer than iPhone SE, it's somewhat thicker and way heavier. The iPhone SE counts with a very superior performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has an inferior number of cores and 10 GB lesser RAM memory.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a bit better display than Apple iPhone SE, because it has way more brightness, a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2400, a really larger display and a little better pixels density. Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a lot better camera than iPhone SE, because it has a way larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a lot better video resolution, a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels and a larger aperture to take better captures in low light situations.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a very superior memory capacity for apps and games than iPhone SE, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a superior battery life than iPhone SE, because it has a 183% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.