Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-03-31 | 2024-04-16 |
| 4.87 x 2.31 x 0.30 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 3.99 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Gold, Rose gold, Silver and Space gray | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 499.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1136 x 640 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A9 APL0898 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GT7600 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.64 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 1.20 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1624mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is much better than the iPhone SE, having a general score of 87.1 against 75.7. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a incredibly newer cellphone than the iPhone SE, although it's somewhat thicker and incredibly heavier. Apple iPhone SE counts with a much better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM and an inferior number of cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much more vibrant display than iPhone SE, because it has much more display brightness, a much bigger display, a bit higher quantity of pixels in each inch in the display and a lot higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra captures much clearer videos and photos than iPhone SE, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has faster 60 fps video frame rates, a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera, a way larger camera sensor shooting much better quality photos and a way larger camera aperture.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much bigger memory for applications and games than Apple iPhone SE, because it has 512 GB internal memory. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much longer battery lifetime than iPhone SE, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 1624mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.