Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2016-03-31 | 2016-09-01 |
| 4.87 x 2.31 x 0.30 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 3.99 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Gold, Rose gold, Silver and Space gray | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 499.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1136 x 640 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A9 APL0898 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GT7600 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 1.20 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1624mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto Z Force has a global score of 75.8, which is slightly better than iPhone SE's overall score of 75.7. The Motorola Moto Z Force construction is notably heavier but just a bit thinner than iPhone SE, and both of them were only released 5 months apart. Moto Z Force counts with a bit superior processor than iPhone SE, because it has 2 GB more RAM memory and a greater number of cores.
Motorola Moto Z Force has a little bit better looking display than iPhone SE, because it has a lot greater pixel density, a way larger screen and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2560px. Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone SE, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a bit better camera than Apple iPhone SE, and although they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Moto Z Force also has a back-facing camera with a lot higher 21 mega pixels resolution and a larger aperture. The Moto Z Force features a way better battery lifetime than Apple iPhone SE, because it has a 116 percent bigger battery capacity.
The Moto Z Force not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.