Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2016-03-31 | 2018-08-16 |
| 4.87 x 2.31 x 0.30 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 3.99 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Gold, Rose gold, Silver and Space gray | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 499.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6 inches |
| 1136 x 640 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A9 APL0898 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GT7600 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 1.20 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1624mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto Z3 is slightly better than iPhone SE, with a score of 77.6 against 75.7. Although Moto Z3 is noticeably heavier than the iPhone SE, it's just a little thinner and also newer. The Moto Z3 counts with a bit better looking screen than iPhone SE, because it has a just a little better screen pixels density, a way larger screen and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2160px.
The Moto Z3 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than iPhone SE, because it has a higher number of cores and 2 GB more RAM memory. Moto Z3 shoots a little bit better photos and videos than iPhone SE, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a camera with a 12 mega pixels, the Moto Z3 also has a bigger aperture to take better low-light photos and videos and a bigger back camera sensor which provides a better photo and video quality.
Moto Z3 has a much better memory to install applications and games than iPhone SE, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Moto Z3 has a way better battery life than Apple iPhone SE, because it has an 85 percent greater battery capacity.
The Moto Z3 is not only the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.