Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-03-31 | 2020-10-02 |
| 4.87 x 2.31 x 0.30 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 3.99 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Gold, Rose gold, Silver and Space gray | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 499.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1136 x 640 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A9 APL0898 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GT7600 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 1.20 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1624mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.44 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has a general score of 87, which is much better than the iPhone SE's general score of 75.7. Motorola razr (2020)'s body is much newer than the iPhone SE's, but it is notably heavier and a bit thicker. Motorola razr (2020) counts with a bit faster CPU than Apple iPhone SE, because it has a larger number of cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
The iPhone SE has a bit sharper screen than Motorola razr (2020), although it has a much smaller screen, a much lower resolution of 640 x 1136px and a just a bit worse pixels density. The Motorola razr (2020) has a lot bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Apple iPhone SE, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Motorola razr (2020) takes way better photographs and videos than Apple iPhone SE, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a way bigger aperture to take better low-light photography and video, a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back camera with a lot better 48 megapixels resolution.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with a superior battery lifetime than iPhone SE, because it has a 2800mAh battery size.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Apple iPhone SE, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Apple iPhone SE. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Motorola razr (2020), but if you don't you can save some money and get the Apple iPhone SE, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.