Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-03-31 | 2019-10-16 |
| 4.87 x 2.31 x 0.30 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 3.99 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Gold, Rose gold, Silver and Space gray | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 499.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1136 x 640 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A9 APL0898 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GT7600 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 1.20 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1624mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a general score of 75.8, which is slightly better than iPhone SE's 75.7 general score. The nubia Red Magic 3S is a extremely newer cellphone than the iPhone SE, although it is incredibly heavier and thicker. The nubia Red Magic 3S has a little bit better screen than iPhone SE, because it has a much better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, a lot bigger screen and a little greater pixels density.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a much better storage capacity for apps and games than iPhone SE, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a superior hardware performance than iPhone SE, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores.
The nubia Red Magic 3S takes much better pictures and videos than iPhone SE, because it has a way bigger sensor shooting much higher quality videos and pictures, a way higher video definition, a lot more MP back facing camera and a way larger aperture to take better low-light images and videos. Nubia Red Magic 3S has a very superior battery lifetime than iPhone SE, because it has a 208 percent more battery capacity.
Although nubia Red Magic 3S is a better device, it is more expensive than the Apple iPhone SE, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Apple iPhone SE. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the nubia Red Magic 3S, otherwise you can save some money and get the Apple iPhone SE, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.