Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| 2016-03-31 | 2019-03-15 |
| 4.87 x 2.31 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 3.99 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Gold, Rose gold, Silver and Space gray | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 499.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1136 x 640 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A9 APL0898 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GT7600 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 1.20 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1624mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is much better than iPhone SE, getting an 83.8 score against 75.7. Galaxy A50 is a a lot heavier cellphone than the iPhone SE, but they are equally thin. The Galaxy A50 features a bit more powerful processing unit than iPhone SE, because it has more RAM memory and more CPU cores. Samsung Galaxy A50 has a slightly better looking screen than iPhone SE, because it has a much larger display, a way better 1080 x 2340px resolution and a just a bit better count of pixels in each inch of display.
The Galaxy A50 counts with a little bit better camera than Apple iPhone SE, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy A50 also has a lot larger aperture to capture better low-light photos, a camera with a much better 25 megapixels resolution and a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing higher quality photographs and videos.
The Galaxy A50 features a superior storage for games and applications than Apple iPhone SE, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A50 also has a SD extension slot that supports up to 512 GB. Galaxy A50 features a superior battery lifetime than iPhone SE, because it has a 146 percent bigger battery size.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Samsung Galaxy A50 is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.