Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-03-31 | 2020-04-29 |
| 4.87 x 2.31 x 0.30 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 3.99 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Gold, Rose gold, Silver and Space gray | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 499.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1136 x 640 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A9 APL0898 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GT7600 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 1.20 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1624mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G is much better than Apple iPhone SE, having a 90.8 score against 75.7. Galaxy A51 5G's construction is much newer, but somewhat thicker and much heavier than Apple iPhone SE. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a little bit better looking screen than iPhone SE, because it has a quite better quantity of pixels per inch of display, a way larger screen and a lot better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Galaxy A51 5G has a bit better processing power than iPhone SE, because it has a higher number of cores and a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy A51 5G features a much better camera than Apple iPhone SE, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a lot bigger sensor, a larger aperture for better captures in low light situations and a camera with a lot better resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Apple iPhone SE, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy A51 5G counts with a much better battery life than Apple iPhone SE, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 1624mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Galaxy A51 5G is also very cheap compared to the other ones, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.