Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-03-31 | 2019-09-27 |
| 4.87 x 2.31 x 0.30 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 3.99 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Gold, Rose gold, Silver and Space gray | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 499.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1136 x 640 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A9 APL0898 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GT7600 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 1.20 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1624mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.44 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a global score of 97.6, which is much better than the Apple iPhone SE's 75.7 score. The Samsung Galaxy Fold design is noticeably newer and a little thinner, but way heavier than the Apple iPhone SE. Galaxy Fold features a greater hardware performance than Apple iPhone SE, because it has more CPU cores and a higher amount of RAM.
Apple iPhone SE and Galaxy Fold feature extremely similar screens, although the Galaxy Fold also has a little bit more pixels per inch of screen, a lot bigger screen and a lot better resolution of 1536 x 2152 pixels. The Galaxy Fold shoots clearer videos and photos than iPhone SE, and although they both have the same video definition and a 12 mega pixels resolution back camera, the Galaxy Fold also has a way bigger aperture, better 60 frames per second video frame rate and a bigger camera sensor taking higher quality videos and photos.
The Galaxy Fold has a superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than iPhone SE, because it has 384 GB more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Fold counts with a way better battery performance than iPhone SE, because it has a 4380mAh battery size.
Samsung Galaxy Fold is way more expensive than iPhone SE, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.