Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2016-03-31 | 2019-02-05 |
| 4.87 x 2.31 x 0.30 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 3.99 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Gold, Rose gold, Silver and Space gray | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 499.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1136 x 640 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 326 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A9 APL0898 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GT7600 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 8.64 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 1.20 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1624mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M20 is a bit better than the Apple iPhone SE, having a 78.9 score against 75.7. Galaxy M20's design is notably newer than Apple iPhone SE's, although it is extremely heavier and somewhat thicker. Galaxy M20 counts with a little better hardware performance than iPhone SE, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a greater number of cores.
Galaxy M20 has a display that is just as good as the display in iPhone SE, although the Galaxy M20 also has a much bigger display, a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and more pixels per inch in the display. Apple iPhone SE captures clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a lower 12 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a tinier aperture which is not nice for capturing images or videos in low-light situations, it also counts with a way better (4K) video quality and a larger back camera sensor taking better quality videos and photographs.
The Galaxy M20 counts with more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone SE, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy M20 has a really longer battery performance than iPhone SE, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.