Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-03-31 | -- |
| 4.87 x 2.31 x 0.30 inches | -- |
| 3.99 ounces | -- |
| Gold, Rose gold, Silver and Space gray | -- |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 499.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1136 x 640 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A9 APL0898 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GT7600 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.64 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 1.20 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1624mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 is just a bit better than the iPhone SE, having a global score of 82.6 against 75.7. The Galaxy S25 is a much lighter and extremely thinner device than the iPhone SE. The Galaxy S25 counts with a way better looking display than iPhone SE, because it has a higher display pixel density, a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2340, a much larger display and way more brightness.
IPhone SE features a really superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has 6 GB lesser RAM and lesser CPU cores. The Galaxy S25 counts with as much memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as the Apple iPhone SE one, both of them have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy S25 counts with a very superior battery life than Apple iPhone SE, because it has a 146% bigger battery capacity. Galaxy S25 captures much better videos and photos than iPhone SE, because it has a much bigger back camera sensor, a way higher video resolution, a back camera with a lot higher 50 mega pixels resolution and a bigger aperture for better photos and video in poorly lited environments.
Samsung Galaxy S25 costs a lot more money than the iPhone SE, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.