Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2016-03-31 | 2014-06-23 |
| 4.87 x 2.31 x 0.30 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 3.99 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Gold, Rose gold, Silver and Space gray | Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 499.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1136 x 640 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A9 APL0898 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR GT7600 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 1.20 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.1 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1624mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 3.44 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S5 Sport has an overall score of 77.8, which is a little bit better than iPhone SE's general score of 75.7. The Galaxy S5 Sport is an older, heavier and thicker phone than iPhone SE. Galaxy S5 Sport features a bit superior CPU than iPhone SE, and although they both have a 2 GB RAM, the Galaxy S5 Sport also has a graphics processing unit and a larger number of cores (and faster).
Galaxy S5 Sport has a more vivid display than iPhone SE, because it has a larger screen, a better pixel density and a way higher 1920 x 1080 resolution. The Apple iPhone SE counts with a much better memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport captures a little bit better pictures and videos than Apple iPhone SE, and although they both have the same video frame rates, a same size aperture and the same (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport also has a larger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a lot better resolution camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has a very superior battery life than Apple iPhone SE, because it has a 72 percent greater battery size.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport is also a bargain compared to the other ones, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.