Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2016-03-31 | 2020-04-04 |
| 4.87 x 2.31 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 3.99 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Gold, Rose gold, Silver and Space gray | Black |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 499.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1136 x 640 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 326 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A9 APL0898 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GT7600 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 1.20 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1624mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 3.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro is slightly better than iPhone SE, with an 80.1 score against 75.7. Galaxy XCover FieldPro's design is extremely newer, but extremely thicker and extremely heavier than the iPhone SE. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a brighter display than Apple iPhone SE, because it has a way better 1440 x 2560 resolution, a much better pixel count per inch of screen and a larger display.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than iPhone SE, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit better hardware performance than Apple iPhone SE, because it has a higher number of cores (and faster) and 2 GB more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a really longer battery duration than Apple iPhone SE, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. Apple iPhone SE counts with a better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a way tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light captures and a tinier sensor which provides a worse image and video quality, and they both have a 12 mega pixels camera, the Apple iPhone SE also counts with a lot higher (4K) video definition.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Apple iPhone SE, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Apple iPhone SE. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy the Apple iPhone SE, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.