Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-03-31 | 2020-01-31 |
| 4.87 x 2.31 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 3.99 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Gold, Rose gold, Silver and Space gray | Black |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 499.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1136 x 640 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 326 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A9 APL0898 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GT7600 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 1.20 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1624mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 3.44 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a score of 81, which is a little bit better than the iPhone SE's 75.7 general score. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro construction is incredibly newer, but heavier and thicker than iPhone SE. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has just a bit better looking screen than iPhone SE, because it has a higher screen pixel density, a way bigger display and a lot higher 1080 x 2340 resolution.
The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a little better processing power than Apple iPhone SE, because it has more RAM and a greater number of cores (and also faster). The Galaxy XCover Pro has a bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Apple iPhone SE, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 512 GB.
Galaxy XCover Pro features a way better battery performance than iPhone SE, because it has a 4050mAh battery size. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has just a bit better camera than iPhone SE, because although it has a lot smaller back-facing camera sensor taking lot worse quality images, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (Full HD) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a lot better resolution back facing camera and a much larger aperture to capture better low light photos.
The Galaxy XCover Pro not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.