Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2016-03-31 | 2020-02-14 |
| 4.87 x 2.31 x 0.30 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 3.99 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gold, Rose gold, Silver and Space gray | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 499.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1136 x 640 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A9 APL0898 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GT7600 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 1.20 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1624mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is better than the Apple iPhone SE, getting a overall score of 88.5 against 75.7. Galaxy Z Flip's construction is newer and a bit thinner, but a lot heavier than the Apple iPhone SE. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a slightly better looking screen than Apple iPhone SE, because it has a greater pixel number per inch in the screen, a lot larger display and a way better 1080 x 2636 pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than iPhone SE, because it has more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a quite better processing power than Apple iPhone SE, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a greater number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a way better battery lifetime than iPhone SE, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy Z Flip captures just a bit better videos and photos than iPhone SE, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same resolution camera in the back, the Galaxy Z Flip also has higher video frame rates, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photos and videos in poorly lited situations and a bigger camera sensor providing a better image quality.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more than iPhone SE, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the iPhone SE. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Galaxy Z Flip, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the iPhone SE, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.