Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-03-31 | 2020-09-18 |
| 4.87 x 2.31 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 3.99 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Gold, Rose gold, Silver and Space gray | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 499.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1136 x 640 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A9 APL0898 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GT7600 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 1.20 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1624mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an overall score of 94.6, which is much better than Apple iPhone SE's score of 75.7. Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is notably heavier than the Apple iPhone SE, it's a little bit thinner and notably newer. Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a more powerful processing unit than Apple iPhone SE, because it has more RAM and more CPU cores.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little sharper display than iPhone SE, because it has a lot better resolution of 1768 x 2208px, a bit more pixels per inch of display and a lot bigger display. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a superior camera than Apple iPhone SE, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a 12 MP resolution back-facing camera, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a way bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, faster 60 frames per second video frame rates and a larger diafragm aperture.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a much better memory capacity to install applications and games than iPhone SE, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a way better battery performance than iPhone SE, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 1624mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Apple iPhone SE, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Apple iPhone SE. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the Apple iPhone SE, giving up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.